comment listing type:
Top New Dark Videos by Vote
Subscribe
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
VideoSift Links
comment listing type: Top New Dark Videos by Vote Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week VideoSift Links |
How Do You Deal With "Trolls"? (Geek Talk Post)
I've only seen one or two occasions where a troll was so disruptive administrative action had to be taken.
Rolling Stones - Emotional Rescue
McCain Claims Obama Rally Crowds Call Him Terrorist, Traitor
AVGN Vs. Nostalgia Critic - The Final Battle!
Campaign Gear in the Voting Booth (Election08 Talk Post)
In Honour of Captainclosetcase420's Gold, Umm... Star
Also not gonna say they're completely wrong with the guys are hornier than women bit, but I think their line of logic is missing one important thing, there is still a huge social stigma towards same sex couples being out in public. In many parts of the country it's almost an open invitation to violence or at the least harassment. So these discreet hook-ups are the best way to avoid that kind of thing.
In my opinion men's natural tendency towards multiple partners is exaggerated in the gay community because of the oppressive social climate. So much so I think it's been ingrained into the actual culture.
It's a historic day in the life of VideoSift (Waronterror Talk Post)
The newest diamond: Eklek (Woohoo Talk Post)
Fast Times at Ridgemont High: Pool Scene NSFW
Rolling Stones - Emotional Rescue
Welcome GourmetEmu to the Gold Star Club (Sift Talk Post)
You've Driven Me Away From the Left (Lies Talk Post)
Unfortunately this is what I think tends to drive a lot of policies, and why you see democrats voting for deregulation, and like now, republicans calling for oversight (they can't bring themselves to actually say regulation). They flip-flop on policies to stay on the side of public opinion and stay in office, it's not an excuse it's just the way it is, and in my opinion one of the draw backs to a democracy. That's why people like Ron Paul are so admirable even if you don't agree with them, because they continue to vote in a consistent way despite public opinion.
Obama has voted for things I don't approve of, the dems have voted for things I don't approve of. Sometimes it'd been under the banner of compromise and something just to go along with public opinion. I still support Obama and the Dems because overall they support the views I support. If there were a viable candidate or party that voted more consistently in a manner I approved, I'd vote for them.
You've Driven Me Away From the Left (Lies Talk Post)
Doing those things makes a company extremely competitive (in the sense they'll attract more customers than other banks), and it makes them look very profitable, until all those crap loans start defaulting and it becomes beyond obvious the banks assets aren't exactly what they were projected to be. But that really doesn't matter to the people who set those policies in the first place because by the time things head south they've made their money, why should they care what happens to the company? Things 'looked' good when they were in charge, so they got paid a lot.
So in a completely free market what will keep that from happening?
Scientists: Va. shark's pup a 'virgin birth' (Nature Talk Post)
Junior Senior - Move your feet