Napalm
Member Profile
Real Name: Patrick
Birthdate: April 10th, 1983 (25 years old)
Birthdate: April 10th, 1983 (25 years old)
Member Since: 2007-10-10
Last Power Points used: 2008-04-02 • Available: now
Max Power Points: 1
Last Power Points used: 2008-04-02 • Available: now
Max Power Points: 1
Comments
1
Subscribe
Dark Videos Submitted by NapalmNavigation
- profile
- unsifted videos (0)
- personal queue videos (1)
- sifted videos (5)
- promoted published vids
- promoted queued vids
- promoted Sift Talk posts
- promoted blog posts
- blog entries (0)
- Sift Talk posts
- discarded posts
- dead/deadpool videos (0)
- my playlist bookmarks
- my post bookmarks
- playlists bookmarked by others
- posts bookmarked by others
- voted up
- voted down
- playlists
Member Stats
Rank: 487
Rating: 5 star points
Votes Received: 181
Votes Cast: 1011
Comments Posted: 205 • browse
Sifted Videos: 5
Sift Talk Posts: 1
Profile Views: 4103
Rating: 5 star points
Votes Received: 181
Votes Cast: 1011
Comments Posted: 205 • browse
Sifted Videos: 5
Sift Talk Posts: 1
Profile Views: 4103
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
*promote
Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
I found a working myspace version.
Dudez a-Plenti
<embed src="http://lads.myspace.com/videos/vplayer.swf" flashvars="m=3858849&v=2&type=video" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="430" height="346"></embed>
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
This video is a dupe of this (http://www.videosift.com/video/will-sasso) one.
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
At least we agree on HL 1 and 2 being excellent
In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
I should have phrased that differently. It's more like "I had fun shooting shit."
But the game is terrible because it's 1) VERY linear, 2) has NO story 3) weapons are LAME 4)play time is criminally short and a few other small nuances. I never said that my opinion was fact, though.
But the game is terrible because it's 1) VERY linear, 2) has NO story 3) weapons are LAME 4)play time is criminally short and a few other small nuances. I never said that my opinion was fact, though.
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
>> ^Napalm:
Wrong.
Wow, that was such a mind-blowingly articulate argument you posted there! You sure took me down a peg! Remind me to never have a debate with you!
Well if you can state your highly subjective opinion as fact then I can too. I just did it with fewer words.
I'm just kind of baffled someone can call Gears of War a "monumental pile of shit" with a straight face. Especially considering you yourself actually admitted the game was fun.
I qoute: "Yes, it was a fun game, if you like the constant non-stop shoot-em up types. The cover system is awesome, though. The camera work in the game is superb, the graphics are great, and yet didn't tax my system at all. The sound was awesome and the combat was very different with the cover system. You will die if you don't use it."
So basically you are complaining about a high price and non stop action.
I still don't see how that makes this game so terrible.
>> ^Napalm:
I'm kinda new to the sift, but what's up with Ant pretty much downvoting everything?
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
In reply to this comment by CaptWillard:
That's it. I'm on the next plane to Haiti.
Agreed! A warm place like that must be paradise, where everybody lives care free!
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
I don't see any subtitles.
Eklek
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
Sound breaks otherwise I would vote.
In reply to this comment by Napalm:
Terrible? More like completely awesome!